It is important to protect the principles of open and accessible internet, and the fundamental rights of privacy and free speech of the internet users in India.
Key dignitaries from research, academia, and media have written a joint letter to Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) regarding concerns over certain provisions in the Draft Information Technology [Intermediaries Guidelines (Amendment) Rules], 2018. The letter was addressed to MeitY Secretary Ajay Prakash Sawhney.
These Draft Rules seek to amend existing Intermediaries Guidelines Rules, 2011 and emanate from Section 79 of Information Technology Act, 2000, which provides safe-harbour protection to intermediaries from liability due to third party content.
However, the letter highlights the following concerns regarding some of the proposed amendments.
Disproportionate use of government regulation
The Draft Rules, despite being targeted primarily on social media platforms and messaging applications, would apply equally to all intermediaries including TSPs, ISPs, Cyber Cafes etc. This is a disproportionate use of government regulation.
Vague terms resulting in ‘chilling effect’
One of the grounds for the Supreme Court striking down Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000 in Shreya Singhal was the vagueness of the terms used in the provision such as ‘offensive, menacing and dangerous’ as these disproportionately invaded the right of free speech. However, words with a similar level of vagueness, such as ‘grossly harmful, harassing and hateful’ still exist in the Draft Rules.
Privacy and breaking encryption
The Draft Rules require intermediaries to include a traceability feature to assist law enforcement agencies. Such a traceability requirement could lead to breaking of encryption on apps such as WhatsApp, and this will be a major threat to the privacy rights of citizens as enshrined in the Puttaswamy judgement of the Supreme Court. Addition of a requirement of traceability in a subordinate legislation is also beyond the rule-making power of the government.
Pre-censorship and automated content filtering
The Draft Rules require intermediaries to deploy automated tools for proactively filtering unlawful content on their platforms. This would result in a pre-censorship régime, violating the right to free speech and expression, where AI technology would crawl through social media to filter and remove content, which it deems ‘unlawful’.
While national security interests are important, there is also a need for internet regulations that are less invasive and proportional. Hence, it is important to protect the principles of open and accessible internet, and the fundamental rights of privacy and free speech of the internet users in India.
The organisations that were signatories to the letter are Alternate Law Forum, Digital Empowerment Foundation, Esya Centre, Free Software Foundation Tamil Nadu, Free Software Movement of India, Free Software Movement Karnataka, HasGeek, Internet Democracy Project, IT for Change, Point of View and Software Freedom Law Centre, India (SFLC.in).
The individual signatories were Abhayraj Naik, Researcher and Visiting Faculty at National Law School; Faisal Farooqui, Founder & CEO, Mouthshut.com; Geeta Seshu, Journalist and Founder, FreeSpeechCollective ; Karma Paljor, Editor-in-Chief, EastMojo; Nikhil Pahwa, Founder, MediaNama.com; Pankaj S Shah, President, Association of System Integrators & Retailers in Technology; Rahul De, Professor at Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore; Shamnad Basheer, Founder, SpicyIP and Honorary Research Chair of IP Law at Nirma University;Shishir K Jha, Professor at IIT — Bombay; Sridhar Pabbisetty, Public Policy and Urban Governance Specialist; and Vikram Vincent, Research Scholar, IIT-Bombay.
Originally published in Business Today.